Review
1444 facts across 22 clients. Two questions each: can we stand behind it, and can an argument be built from it.
Nothing here blocks anything. Strategy already runs on these — approving a fact only tells it which to reach for first. Ten minutes on your biggest client is worth more than clearing the list.
Two things the system found that disagree, and it refused to pick. Each carries both claims and the options the critic drafted — settling one writes how it was settled, because the next person to hit the same contradiction reads only that.
Firm use of event activations: blanket ban versus conditional peak-hours ban
On the record
Event activations in Zone C are reserved for homeowners; participating firms are asked not to use them during the event
Arrived since
Participating firms may not use the event activations during peak hours without clearance from the organising team
Why it matters: Briefing firms on the looser rule when the stricter one applies puts designers in the photobooth, ice cream and VR queues that homeowners paid attention for. Loosening a restriction should never happen by recency default.
Drafted options — clicking fills the note, it does not submit
Venue change invalidates the boundaries of many Pico-specific facts still held as current
On the record
The event occupies the entire level one of Pico Creative Centre; 14,000 sqft curated event floor at Pico Creative Centre; Zone A-D layout; parking at Pure Mall one minute away; outdoor patio outside Zone A; smoking corner behind Zone D at lobby B
Arrived since
Event is held at King Living Alexandra, located at Taihong Center; the venue is a two-storey building with Level 1 used for consultations
Why it matters: Around a dozen capability and process records are silently scoped to Pico. If they stay unqualified, marketing can claim a 14,000 sqft floor, entire-level-one exclusivity, or one-minute mall parking for an event at a different building — each a factual claim nobody has verified for the new venue.
Drafted options — clicking fills the note, it does not submit
Two different claims about the organisers' single primary objective
On the record
The organisers' stated main goal for every event is that attending homeowners are genuine
Arrived since
The organisers' primary objective for the event is a smooth event flow, based on positive homeowner feedback from past events
Why it matters: This positioning statement anchors how the event is described to both firms and homeowners. Swapping genuine-homeowner filtering for smooth flow changes the pitch to participating firms about lead quality.
Drafted options — clicking fills the note, it does not submit
Second organiser contact named as Jai in one source and Kai in another
On the record
Organisers Alexander Singh and Jai are contactable by participating firms via WhatsApp or phone with questions
Arrived since
Participating firms are told to use the existing WhatsApp group or direct private messages to Alexander Singh or Kai for ongoing communication and questions
Why it matters: A wrong organiser name published to participating firms sends event-day questions to nobody, and the error propagates into every deck that reuses the fact.
Drafted options — clicking fills the note, it does not submit
King Living partnership contact named as Shino in one source and Sean in another
On the record
Partner deals and collaborations for participating firms are coordinated through Shino from King Living, whose contact details are in the event deck
Arrived since
Interior design firms interested in partnership deals with King Living can contact Sean from King Living, whose details are in the presentation deck
Why it matters: Firms chasing partnership deals will contact the wrong person at the furniture partner, which costs deals and damages the relationship with King Living.
Drafted options — clicking fills the note, it does not submit
bizSAFE level recorded at two different levels, both as verified external
On the record
Holds a bizSAFE Level 4 badge (verified_external) vs. 'We are BizSafe Level 3 certified' (verified_external)
Arrived since
Builds interactive elements from scratch for the events it manages
Why it matters: Surfaced while reconciling the capability and credential set for this source. A certification level cannot be both 3 and 4 at once, and the base also plans to display the be-safe badge publicly in an achievements section, so the wrong level would be published on the website.
Drafted options — clicking fills the note, it does not submit
Follower count of 162 recorded without naming the platform
On the record
Facebook following of 109 followers; LinkedIn following of 533 followers
Arrived since
A social account follower count of 162 was referenced during the engagement-rate discussion
Why it matters: An unattributed follower figure cannot be reconciled with the per-platform counts already held. If it is later assumed to be Facebook it implies a jump from 109 to 162 in about a month, which would misstate growth; if it is Instagram it silently creates a first Instagram baseline nobody verified. Either way it is the denominator behind the quoted 4.2-5% engagement rate.
Drafted options — clicking fills the note, it does not submit
Award count records disagree, and a new win is not yet reflected in either
On the record
Holds four marketing event awards, across the years 2018, 2019, 2021 and 2025 (verified_external) vs. 'We are BizSafe Level 3 certified and recipients of two industry awards' (verified_external)
Arrived since
Won an award for the national anti-scam roadshow project
Why it matters: The base already holds two irreconcilable award totals, and an unverified new win makes a third. Any public 'award-winning' line drawn from this will be wrong, and the brief calls for awards to be displayed as consistent multi-year recognition with official unaltered logos, which requires an exact, verified list.
Drafted options — clicking fills the note, it does not submit
Two inconsistent revenue bands for portal-free testimonial clients from the same source
On the record
Three out of four testimonial clients rely exclusively on the agency without portals and generate approximately $2 to $3 million in annual revenue
Arrived since
Two client firms generate $3 to $4 million in revenue with small teams and no showroom
Why it matters: Both describe portal-free client firms and give different revenue bands. If the two firms are inside the three-of-four group the claims cannot both hold, and a results figure quoted in a deck or ad is exactly the kind of number that gets rounded up in retelling.
Drafted options — clicking fills the note, it does not submit
Agency-subject claims are entering a knowledge base whose subject is Interior Box, and the agency is already described as 'part of the in-house team'
On the record
Plans to collaborate with PR firms (e.g. Brand Seller) for brand exposure, with the media buying agency introduced as part of the in-house team
Arrived since
Agency has managed over $3 million in ad spend; Agency has worked with more than 100 businesses across Singapore; Agency has been operating for three years (plus ~20 further agency-subject capability and pricing facts)
Why it matters: Attribution is part of the fact. Because the agency is presented as in-house, its track record can be restated one step later as Interior Box's own — '$3m in ad spend managed' or '100+ businesses served' published under the brand would be an unverified claim about a company that never made it.
Drafted options — clicking fills the note, it does not submit
Agency specialty stated as back-end work against an existing claim of software and web app development expertise, alongside broad creative capability records
On the record
Agency claims specialised expertise in software and web app development
Arrived since
Agency identifies its specialty as back-end work
Why it matters: Specialty claims are positioning statements that end up in pitches and proposals. 'Back-end work' and 'software and web app development' point at different buyers, and both sit awkwardly beside records claiming an in-house creative team, content creation and ad creative production. An unresolved specialty claim produces inconsistent positioning across assets.
Drafted options — clicking fills the note, it does not submit
Slack notifications recorded as active for bookings, but two bookings produced no Slack notification
On the record
Slack notifications are active for both form submissions and appointment bookings
Arrived since
Two calls booked on the morning of the call did not appear in Slack and arrived under an unfamiliar calendar name ('career consultation' rather than '1-on-1 career consultation call - Zoom'), suggesting another calendar link is still live
Why it matters: The team workflow is recorded as depending on only two systems, the calendar and Slack. If a stray calendar link is bypassing both the notification and the source tracking, leads are arriving unattributed and possibly unworked — the exact failure the migration was meant to close.
Drafted options — clicking fills the note, it does not submit