A
?

Todzterior

Interior Design / Renovation← All clients

Generate

One click — finds an insight, builds the argument, writes copy, generates the image.

17 facts3 insights6 angles2 copy
Full strategy run (multiple insights, angles, copy)

Strategy

Reads what is known about this client and their market, then works out what is worth arguing, how to argue it, and writes the copy. Takes a few minutes.

Insights

what is worth arguing, and why only we can

$7 per foot run is not a price, it is a rate — which means nobody, including us, knows what you save until your floor plan is measured.

killedreframedraft

Only we can say it: It depends on our pricing being published as a per-foot-run rate across four separate item types with their own retail anchors, and on the floor-plan door gift making the plan the entry ticket rather than a contact form. A firm quoting package lump sums has nothing to convert and no reason to ask for a plan first.

Critic: The two facts the ownability argument rests on are both category defaults, not client property. Per-foot-run is the universal unit of carpentry pricing in this market, so the 'rate not a price' reframe is available to literally every competitor unchanged, and the floor-plan door gift is the most common lead capture device at reno roadshows. The claim that 'a firm quoting package lump sums has nothing to convert' is also self-defeating, since this client quotes NETT package lump sums in the same fact set. Beyond ownability, the insight only completes itself as a consultation booking — it can be expressed as a bottom-funnel offer ad and almost nothing else, which is fatal in a set where all three insights already ride the same promo. Could be run unchanged by: Any Singapore carpentry-led renovation contractor or ID firm; carpentry is quoted per foot run industry-wide, and 'bring your floor plan for a free consultation and door gift' is the standard roadshow lead mechanic..

5 constraints on how this may be written
  • — Do not quote a total saving figure for an unnamed buyer — the saving is a function of their foot run and no approved fact fixes an average run length
  • — Do not imply the consultation produces a binding quote or a contract
  • — Do not use fear of overpaying as present-tense personal pain; no purchase_context or vocabulary research exists to support that framing
  • — Do not present the door gift as the reason to come — the plan measurement is the reason
  • — Do not lead with CaseTrust accreditation

The caps are itemised, not pooled — 5 island kitchens, 6 TV walls, 10 wardrobes — so this weekend belongs to people who already know which one item they want, and not to people still choosing a look.

killeddisqualifydraft

Only we can say it: It requires published per-item allocations in single digits alongside NETT package prices for the undecided. A competitor with a blanket 'limited slots' promo cannot make this argument because there is nothing to allocate and no honest reason to turn anyone away.

Critic: The strongest of the three, and still dead on two tests. Ownability: a cap is a number a firm chooses, not a capability, so the per-item allocation can be copied unchanged the next weekend; there is no asymmetry a competitor would have to build. Purchase context: renovation is a once-a-decade purchase, and the insight assumes an audience that has already narrowed to one specific carpentry item and one specific weekend — a decision-ready state that describes a small, already-warm slice of the market. It therefore only expresses itself as an event/bottom-funnel ad, and since all three insights in this set are anchored to the same promo dates and prices, the pattern is an offer-led account talking to people who already know it. The disqualification move is also arguing at the offer level while dressed as identity: it changes who is invited to a promo, not what the brand means. Could be run unchanged by: Any ID firm running a capped-set promo — 'only 5 sets available' per item is routine roadshow copy, and inventing per-item single-digit allocations costs a competitor one afternoon..

5 constraints on how this may be written
  • — Do not manufacture urgency beyond the published counts and the 12-13 September 2026 dates
  • — Do not imply items will be gone before the event or that counts are lower than stated
  • — Do not disparage undecided buyers — the disqualification is about timing, not taste
  • — Do not assert that renovation is a once-in-a-lifetime or emotionally fraught purchase: no purchase_context research supports it
  • — Do not lead with CaseTrust accreditation or with the Spin & Win mechanic

A 96% discount is a credibility problem before it is a bargain — so the ad's job is to publish the ceiling that makes the price possible, not to shout the price.

killedmechanismdraft

Only we can say it: A competitor running a discount cannot copy the specific structure: per-item allocations at four different retail anchors reducing to one common $7/ft rate, plus a named upgrade package (BLUM, soft close, low-formaldehyde plywood) quantified at $3,500, plus a two-day anniversary date that explains why the ceiling exists. Copying it means publishing their own retail rates and their own unit caps, which most promo advertising is deliberately built to avoid.

Critic: Fails the swap test and the conventions test at the same time. The claimed mechanism — publishing retail anchors, per-item caps, a free upgrade valued in dollars and a two-day window — is not a structure a competitor would have to rebuild; it is the standing convention of Singapore renovation promo advertising. Every ID firm already prints struck-through retail rates, 'limited sets', 'GST absorbed' and a named hardware brand (BLUM is a supplier, not a proprietary asset). The insight's natural expression is therefore a price table with justification text, i.e. the table-stakes ad, and no copywriter can rescue it. It also argues at the offer level while presenting itself as a creative reframe: the only genuinely interesting question — whether a 96% headline discount should be run at all — is answered by 'shout it more carefully'. Could be run unchanged by: Any Qanvast-listed Singapore HDB interior design firm running a roadshow or anniversary promo — the U.P.-versus-promo price table with 'first 20 sets only' is their house style..

5 constraints on how this may be written
  • — Do not lead with CaseTrust accreditation — it supports the contract-and-deposit side and cannot be the idea
  • — Do not state or imply the promo price is available in unlimited quantity or beyond 12-13 September 2026
  • — Do not claim to be cheapest, best value or best in Singapore — no approved fact supports a competitive price comparison
  • — Do not assert present-tense personal renovation distress: no purchase_context research exists for this market, so frequency- and pain-based claims are unsupported
  • — Do not describe the retail rates as competitor prices — they are our own retail anchors

Angles

an angle and one copy variant must both be approved before anything generates+ Write one by hand

Don't come without the plan

tofdraft

If you don't have your floor plan, don't come down.

If you don't have your floor plan, don't come down.draft
You've been putting this off because you think we'll talk at you for an hour.draft
Eh, this $7/ft thing — can I walk in this weekend?draft

Publish the ceiling

tofdraft

You saw $7 a foot and decided it was bait. Fair.

You saw $7 a foot run and decided it was bait. Fair.draft
Three things you're thinking about $7 a foot rundraft
$7 a foot run. You did the maths and it came out wrong.draft
4 things I'd check before believing our own addraft

Rate, not price

tofdraft

$7 per foot run is not a price. It's a rate.

Reads as a negation-then-correction — Banned in copy-structures. Say the positive thing directly.

$7 per foot run is not a price. It's a rate.draft
$290/ft. $230/ft. $170/ft. All $7/ft.draft
How $7/ft becomes your actual numberdraft

Wrong weekend, right price

tofdraft

Still arguing about whether you even want an island? Then skip our promo weekend.

Still arguing about the island? Skip our promo weekend.draft
You can have the package without the weekenddraft
Don't come on 12-13 September if you're still decidingdraft

One rate, four retail anchors

mofdraft

Three quotes on your phone, three promotions attached. Here are our retail rates instead.

Four retail rates. One rate for two days.draft
What's in a promo package, line by linedraft
Five reasons to keep 12 and 13 September freedraft
10 wardrobes. 5 island kitchens. 6 TV feature walls.draft
$170 a foot run. Then $7.draft

Five, not five hundred

tofapprovedgenerates

There are five island kitchens. Not five hundred. Five.

Reads as a negation-then-correction — Banned in copy-structures. Say the positive thing directly.

Don't come on 12 September if you haven't picked the item.approved
Sept 12-13 — the whole allocationapproved
Every promo ad says "limited slots". Here's ours, broken out item by item.draft
$170/ft becomes $7/ft. There are 20 sets.draft

Creative

every render is read back and checked before it counts

2 approved lines with no creative yet. Directing costs cents; rendering costs credits.

Sept 12-13 — the whole allocation
Don't come on 12 September if you haven't picked the item.

No creative yet. Approve copy first, then direct it.

Script Library

0

No scripts yet. Add past scripts so the AI learns your voice.