A
?

Atlas Homes

Interior Design / Renovation← All clients

Report · April 2026

paid media

Numbers from the portal, not typed. Fill the bracketed lines, drop the internal block, and it is the deck. The shape is fixed by the reporting SOP.

Weekly message, this month to date (Monday, WhatsApp)

Hi team, quick October 2026 check-in from Atlas. Spend so far $24,759 over 18 days, 129 lead at $192 each. [AM: one line on what changed this week and what we are watching.] We will send the full report at month end.

1. What happened

[AM: two sentences: the outcome in the client's words, and the one reason behind it]

Spend

$22,306

+238% vs March 2026

lead

308

+75% vs last month

Cost per lead

$72

+93% vs last month

Creatives live

1

0 angles, 0 copy variants shipped

Cost per lead up 93% against March 2026, on spend up 238%. Volume up 75%.

Top ads

  • RENO-RETREAT-BATCH-001-4.4$5,992101 lead$59
  • RENO-RETREAT-BATCH-001-4.2$3,16650 lead$63
  • RENO-RETREAT-BATCH-001-4.8$2,55831 lead$83
  • RENO-RETREAT-BATCH-001-4.1$2,49130 lead$83
  • RENO-RETREAT-LP-BATCH-001-4.8$1,58314 lead$113

2. What we are doing next

[Media buyer: the decisions made this month and why, from the decisions log, in three lines]

[AM: what the client will see change next month, matched to what they said they want]

· No meaningful difference by format — best and worst are within 21% of each other across 2 readable cuts. That is a real finding: it means this axis is not where the variance lives, so effort spent varying it is effort not spent on one that matters.

· SGD 316535 of spend sits on ads whose names say nothing about format, hook or angle, so it teaches us nothing. That is the price of the old naming, and it falls to zero on its own as new ads ship under the convention.

· Cost per lead rose more than a fifth against March 2026. Worth separating creative fatigue from an auction that simply got more expensive — frequency and CPM tell those apart.

· No new angle was approved for April 2026 while the account was spending. Everything running is inherited, which is fine for a month and is how an account quietly ages.

3. What we cannot see this month

· What happened after the lead. The platform reports the enquiry and nothing past it, so cost per lead is knowable and cost per customer is not — that lives in the client's own numbers.

· How long this client has been with us. No engagement start date is recorded, so this report cannot tell a first month from a twelfth — and those should not read alike, since the first establishes a baseline and the twelfth is judged against one.

· Which of our angles produced which result. All 6 ad(s) this month predate the naming convention, and live ads are not renamed — so this is closed rather than outstanding. Ads created from now on carry an angle code and attribute themselves.

· Organic social — followers, reach, engagement rate and audience demographics. No figures were recorded for this month. They can be typed in from each platform's dashboard, which is what happens today except the numbers currently go into a slide and are lost.

Internal, never sent

Effort: 6 ads live, 0 angles shipped, 1 formats. Retainer —.

  • Video production No video or reel ran this month — static only. We have an in-house production team, so this is capacity we already pay for and are not selling.
  • Creative refresh Nothing new was approved this month while the account spent SGD 22306. Every ad running is inherited, and inherited creative is the thing that quietly stops working.

The unfiltered version. If an account is going badly the AM must know before the client does.