A
?

Atlas & Bone

Fashion / E-commerce← All clients

Report · July 2026

paid media

Numbers from the portal, not typed. Fill the bracketed lines, drop the internal block, and it is the deck. The shape is fixed by the reporting SOP. Month 3 of the engagement.

Weekly message, this month to date (Monday, WhatsApp)

Hi team, quick October 2026 check-in from Atlas. Spend so far $1,457 over 17 days, 33 purchase at $44 each. [AM: one line on what changed this week and what we are watching.] We will send the full report at month end.

1. What happened

[AM: two sentences: the outcome in the client's words, and the one reason behind it]

Spend

$2,481

+11% vs June 2026

purchase

54

+54% vs last month

Cost per purchase

$46

-28% vs last month

Creatives live

2

0 angles, 0 copy variants shipped

Cost per purchase down 28% against June 2026, on spend up 11%. Volume up 54%.

Top ads

  • AM - ASC - Tailored Tee IMG 2$78019 purchase$41
  • AM - ASC - Tailored Tee IMG GRP 3$3527 purchase$50
  • AM - ASC - Tailored Tee 1$3334 purchase$83
  • AM - ASC - New Arrivals Collection$30616 purchase$19
  • AM - ASC - Knit Polo$2573 purchase$86

2. What we are doing next

[Media buyer: the decisions made this month and why, from the decisions log, in three lines]

[AM: what the client will see change next month, matched to what they said they want]

· Nothing yet. No creative axis has two cuts thick enough to compare across 72 ad(s) in 180 days, which is the normal state at this spend — and "we do not know" is a better answer than a ranking of four conversions that somebody then builds a quarter around.

· SGD 13182 of spend sits on ads whose names say nothing about format, hook or angle, so it teaches us nothing. That is the price of the old naming, and it falls to zero on its own as new ads ship under the convention.

· Cost per purchase fell more than a fifth against June 2026. Worth naming what changed while it is still fresh, so it can be repeated deliberately.

· The largest share of spend went to "AM - ASC - Tailored Tee IMG 2" at 2.54x, while "AM - ASC - New Arrivals Collection" returned 6.21x on less. Worth asking rather than acting on: Meta may be funding the first because it contributes to conversions credited elsewhere, which last-click reporting cannot show.

· Month 3 of this engagement. There is little history to judge against yet, so the useful output is a baseline — cost per purchase, which formats reach people, and what a normal month looks like — rather than a trend claimed from two data points.

· No new angle was approved for July 2026 while the account was spending. Everything running is inherited, which is fine for a month and is how an account quietly ages.

3. What we cannot see this month

· Which of our angles produced which result. All 6 ad(s) this month predate the naming convention, and live ads are not renamed — so this is closed rather than outstanding. Ads created from now on carry an angle code and attribute themselves.

Internal, never sent

Numbers not trustworthy yet: SAMPLE DATA PRESENT in the organic figures. At least one number here is an acceptance-testing fixture rather than a measurement. Do not send this to a client under any circumstances until every organic source reads api or manual.

Effort: 6 ads live, 0 angles shipped, 1 formats. Retainer $1,500, spend is 1.7x the retainer.

  • Landing page and checkout work 82% of people who added to cart never bought. The ads earned that intent and the site lost it, which is work we can quote for and which no amount of new creative fixes.
  • Video production No video or reel ran this month — static only. We have an in-house production team, so this is capacity we already pay for and are not selling.
  • Creative refresh Nothing new was approved this month while the account spent SGD 2481. Every ad running is inherited, and inherited creative is the thing that quietly stops working.

The unfiltered version. If an account is going badly the AM must know before the client does.