A
?

Atlas & Bone

Fashion / E-commerce← All clients

Media buying

2026-09-18 → 2026-10-17 · $2,387.69 across 3 campaigns · target $75.01 per result

Too few accounts in this industry to compare against, so targets are the median of 10 Atlas accounts across all industries — read them loosely.

AM - ASC

Unclassified
$1,477.13 · 36 results · 30 active days · freq 1.4
Cost per 1,000 shown

$15.86

target $51.44

Click-through rate

2.41%

target 2.49%

At target, cost per result would be $39.74

Cost per click

$0.66

target $2.07

bottleneck
Click to result

1.60%

target 4.37%

At target, cost per result would be $15.05

Cost per result

$41.03

target $75.01

Click to result is the binding constraint: bringing it to target is worth $25.98 per result. Whether the offer and the form hold the people who clicked.

Moves available

  • Fix the offer or the formnow

    The clicks are being bought and lost after the click. Check the form length, the offer and the speed of first contact.

    Click to result is well off benchmark: 1.60% against 4.37%.

    Expected: Cost per result $41.03 → $15.05 if this alone reached benchmark. (arithmetic — substituting the target into the funnel identity)

    If it goes wrong: Nothing in the ad account changes, so no learning is lost — but the fix sits with the client's process, not the buyer's.

  • Raise budget a stepthis week

    Increase by 20–30% and hold for a week. Not a double — that skips the reading.

    $41.03 against a $75.01 target, with nothing failing a kill rule.

    Baseline: 63% · Of 46 campaign-weeks where spend rose 15% or more, 29 kept cost per result within 20% the following week.

    Expected: More results at a cost per result that will rise somewhat. How much is the thing being measured. (from the media buying SOP)

    If it goes wrong: Each extra dollar chases a harder buyer, so cost per result climbs as budget does. A step shows you where that stops paying; a double hides it.

  • Widen the ad bankwhen there is time

    0 live against roughly 1 for this spend. Fill empty cells in the creative matrix — new angles, not new edits.

    Near-copies are treated as one ad, so more spend behind fewer angles reaches the same people more often.

    Expected: Lower cost per result over weeks, by giving the system more kinds of person to win cheaply. (from the media buying SOP)

    If it goes wrong: Production cost, and a wider bank spreads spend thinner — each ad takes longer to prove itself.

AM - ASC New Products

Unclassified
$890.72 · 19 results · 29 active days · freq 1.8
Cost per 1,000 shown

$18.91

target $51.44

bottleneck
Click-through rate

1.38%

target 2.49%

At target, cost per result would be $25.98

Cost per click

$1.37

target $2.07

Click to result

2.92%

target 4.37%

At target, cost per result would be $31.36

Cost per result

$46.88

target $75.01

Click-through rate is the binding constraint: bringing it to target is worth $20.90 per result. Whether the creative stops anyone. This is a creative problem, not a budget one.

Moves available

  • Fix attention before budgetnow

    Produce new angles rather than adding spend. The SOP's order of impact puts creative strategy first and settings last.

    Click-through rate is well off benchmark: 1.38% against 2.49%.

    Expected: Cost per result $46.88 → $25.98 if this alone reached benchmark. (arithmetic — substituting the target into the funnel identity)

    If it goes wrong: Production time, and a new angle can be worse than the one it replaced. Cheaper to find out at low spend.

  • Raise budget a stepthis week

    Increase by 20–30% and hold for a week. Not a double — that skips the reading.

    $46.88 against a $75.01 target, with nothing failing a kill rule.

    Baseline: 63% · Of 46 campaign-weeks where spend rose 15% or more, 29 kept cost per result within 20% the following week.

    Expected: More results at a cost per result that will rise somewhat. How much is the thing being measured. (from the media buying SOP)

    If it goes wrong: Each extra dollar chases a harder buyer, so cost per result climbs as budget does. A step shows you where that stops paying; a double hides it.

AM - Traffic

Awarenessnot in the client’s cost per result
$19.84 · 0 results · 1 active day · freq 1.1
Cost per 1,000 shown

$6.24

target $51.44

Click-through rate

6.67%

target 2.49%

Cost per click

$0.09

target $2.07

Click to result

0.00%

target 4.37%

At target, cost per result would be $2.14

Cost per result

—

target $75.01

Too little spend in this window to read the funnel — the rates are noise at this volume.

Percentages marked baseline come from this portfolio’s own campaign history — what happened to campaigns in the same state when nobody intervened. They are the bar a move has to clear, not the move’s own success rate. Once enough decisions are logged they are replaced by worked, which counts decisions actually taken.

Nothing here changes the account. The Meta connection reads only — it could not pause an ad if it tried — so every move is for a person to make. Frequency is impressions over summed daily reach, which runs a little high against Ads Manager’s own figure.