A
?

Occra Education

Education / Coaching← All clients

Report · September 2026

paid media

Numbers from the portal, not typed. Fill the bracketed lines, drop the internal block, and it is the deck. The shape is fixed by the reporting SOP.

Weekly message, this month to date (Monday, WhatsApp)

Hi team, quick October 2026 check-in from Atlas. Spend so far $2,370 over 17 days, 20 lead at $118 each. [AM: one line on what changed this week and what we are watching.] We will send the full report at month end.

1. What happened

[AM: two sentences: the outcome in the client's words, and the one reason behind it]

Spend

$1,346

+2% vs August 2026

lead

48

-37% vs last month

Cost per lead

$28

+61% vs last month

Creatives live

0

0 angles, 0 copy variants shipped

Cost per lead up 61% against August 2026, on spend up 2%. Volume down 37%.

Top ads

  • SCC2026_BATCH01_STATIC1$38518 lead$21
  • SCC2026_BATCH01_AD1_HK1$37511 lead$34
  • SCC2026_BATCH01_AD2_HK1$2407 lead$34
  • SCC2026_BATCH01_AD1_HK2$2278 lead$28
  • SCC2026_BATCH01_STATIC2$732 lead$37

2. What we are doing next

[Media buyer: the decisions made this month and why, from the decisions log, in three lines]

[AM: what the client will see change next month, matched to what they said they want]

· Nothing yet. No creative axis has two cuts thick enough to compare across 75 ad(s) in 180 days, which is the normal state at this spend — and "we do not know" is a better answer than a ranking of four conversions that somebody then builds a quarter around.

· SGD 11022 of spend sits on ads whose names say nothing about format, hook or angle, so it teaches us nothing. That is the price of the old naming, and it falls to zero on its own as new ads ship under the convention.

· Cost per lead rose more than a fifth against August 2026. Worth separating creative fatigue from an auction that simply got more expensive — frequency and CPM tell those apart.

· No new angle was approved for September 2026 while the account was spending. Everything running is inherited, which is fine for a month and is how an account quietly ages.

3. What we cannot see this month

· What happened after the lead. The platform reports the enquiry and nothing past it, so cost per lead is knowable and cost per customer is not — that lives in the client's own numbers.

· How long this client has been with us. No engagement start date is recorded, so this report cannot tell a first month from a twelfth — and those should not read alike, since the first establishes a baseline and the twelfth is judged against one.

· Which of our angles produced which result. All 6 ad(s) this month predate the naming convention, and live ads are not renamed — so this is closed rather than outstanding. Ads created from now on carry an angle code and attribute themselves.

Internal, never sent

Effort: 6 ads live, 0 angles shipped, 0 formats. Retainer —.

  • A second funnel to test against Everything ran through one campaign ("SCC2026"). On another account a lead-magnet funnel came in at a quarter of the CPM of a book-a-call funnel, and there is no way to know which suits this client without a second one in market.
  • Creative refresh Nothing new was approved this month while the account spent SGD 1346. Every ad running is inherited, and inherited creative is the thing that quietly stops working.

The unfiltered version. If an account is going badly the AM must know before the client does.